Last updated: March 2026
What Are Quality Indicators?
Quality indicators are standardised measures used by the Australian Skills Quality Authority (ASQA) to monitor the performance and quality of Registered Training Organisations across Australia. Under the Standards for RTOs 2025, all ASQA-regulated RTOs are required to collect and report quality indicator data annually.
These indicators serve a dual purpose: they help ASQA identify RTOs that may be at risk of non-compliance, and they provide RTOs themselves with valuable data for continuous improvement. Strong quality indicator performance can reduce your regulatory risk profile, while poor or declining results may attract additional scrutiny.
The Three Quality Indicators
1. Learner Engagement Survey
The Learner Engagement survey collects feedback from current and recent learners about their training experience. It covers several dimensions of the learner journey:
- Training quality: Whether the training was relevant, well-structured, and delivered by competent trainers
- Assessment quality: Whether assessment was fair, clearly explained, and relevant to the training content
- Learner support: Whether the RTO provided adequate support services, including academic support, career guidance, and welfare assistance
- Learning resources: Whether training materials were current, comprehensive, and useful for learning
- Overall satisfaction: The learner's overall experience and whether they would recommend the RTO
The quality of your learning resources directly impacts learner engagement scores. Well-designed, comprehensive learner guides that are contextualised to the industry and AQF level contribute to positive learner experiences.
2. Employer Satisfaction Survey
The Employer Satisfaction survey gathers feedback from employers who have engaged with your RTO's graduates or been involved in training and assessment. Key areas covered include:
- Graduate competency: Whether graduates can perform the skills described in their qualification at a workplace-ready level
- Job-readiness: Whether graduates demonstrate the foundational employment skills needed in the workplace
- Training relevance: Whether the training content and assessment reflect current industry practice and employer needs
- Employer engagement: Whether the RTO effectively engages with employers in training design, delivery, and assessment validation
Strong employer satisfaction results indicate that your training and assessment tools are producing genuinely competent graduates — not just learners who can pass assessments.
3. Competency Completion
Competency completion measures the proportion of commenced units of competency that are successfully completed by learners. This data is drawn from your AVETMISS reporting and provides an objective measure of learner success rates.
Low completion rates can indicate problems with training delivery, learner support, assessment design, or pre-enrolment processes. Factors that affect completion include:
- Quality and accessibility of training materials
- Appropriateness of assessment methods and difficulty
- Effectiveness of learner support services
- Accuracy of pre-enrolment information and learner screening
- Workplace and industry factors affecting learner availability
How ASQA Uses Quality Indicator Data
ASQA uses quality indicator data as one input to its risk-based regulatory model. The data contributes to ASQA's overall risk assessment of each RTO, alongside other factors such as complaint history, compliance history, and data quality.
Risk-Based Regulation in Practice
- Low risk: RTOs with consistently strong quality indicators, no complaints, and a clean compliance history may receive minimal regulatory attention
- Medium risk: RTOs with mixed or declining quality indicators may receive increased monitoring, such as requests for additional information or desktop audits
- High risk: RTOs with poor quality indicators combined with complaints, poor AVETMISS data quality, or compliance history may face site audits or regulatory action
It's important to understand that poor quality indicators alone do not trigger automatic sanctions. ASQA considers the overall picture, including the size of the RTO, the volume of training delivered, and the context of the data. However, consistently declining trends are a significant risk signal.
Improving Your Quality Indicator Outcomes
Strategies for Learner Engagement
- Invest in high-quality, current learning resources that are contextualised to your industry and learner cohort
- Ensure assessment is clearly explained, fairly administered, and timely
- Provide accessible and responsive learner support services
- Regularly collect and act on learner feedback throughout the course, not just at the end
- Train your trainers in effective facilitation, not just subject matter expertise
Strategies for Employer Satisfaction
- Engage employers in the design and validation of assessment tools and training strategies
- Ensure assessment activities reflect current workplace practices and industry standards
- Include workplace projects and practical demonstrations in your assessment design
- Maintain regular communication with employers about training progress and graduate readiness
- Contextualise training content to reflect real industry scenarios and terminology
Strategies for Competency Completion
- Ensure pre-enrolment processes accurately assess learner readiness and expectations
- Provide early intervention support for learners who are falling behind
- Design assessment that is rigorous but achievable for appropriately enrolled learners
- Offer flexible delivery modes and assessment timing where possible
- Monitor enrolment and completion data regularly to identify trends early
How RTOFlow Supports Quality Outcomes
While quality indicators measure many aspects of RTO operations, the quality of training and assessment resources is a foundational factor. RTOFlow contributes to positive quality outcomes by:
- Generating comprehensive, professionally formatted learning resources that enhance the learner experience
- Creating assessment tools that are thoroughly mapped to unit requirements, supporting valid and reliable assessment
- Ensuring resources are always aligned to the current version of training packages from training.gov.au
- Providing consistent quality across all units, eliminating variation from different authors or developers
- Freeing trainer time to focus on delivery quality and learner support rather than document development
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the ASQA quality indicators?
ASQA uses three quality indicators to monitor RTO performance: the Learner Engagement Survey (measuring learner satisfaction with training quality, assessment, and support), the Employer Satisfaction Survey (measuring employer views on graduate competency and job-readiness), and Competency Completion data (measuring the proportion of commenced units successfully completed by learners).
Are quality indicators mandatory for RTOs?
Yes. Under the Standards for RTOs 2025, all RTOs regulated by ASQA are required to collect and report quality indicator data annually. This includes administering the Learner Engagement and Employer Satisfaction surveys and submitting the results, along with competency completion data, to ASQA by the required deadline each year.
How do quality indicators affect ASQA audits?
ASQA uses quality indicator data as part of its risk-based regulatory approach. RTOs with strong quality indicator results and no complaints may receive less frequent audit attention. Conversely, poor quality indicator outcomes, particularly declining trends, may increase ASQA's risk assessment of your RTO and trigger additional regulatory scrutiny or audit activity.
How can an RTO improve its quality indicator results?
Improving quality indicator outcomes requires focus on the quality of training and assessment, learner support, and employer engagement. Key strategies include ensuring training materials are current, comprehensive, and well-contextualised; providing consistent, fair assessment with clear criteria; offering responsive learner support services; engaging employers in training and assessment design; and acting on feedback received through the quality indicator surveys.